AIS
Future-Ready MathematicsK–5 Curriculum Portal · 2026–2027

CURRICULUM AT A GLANCE

One coherent journey from counting to future-ready decisions

Explore 35 weeks of standards-led mathematics across Kindergarten–Grade 5.

2026–27

Grade pathways

35 weeks each

Framework architecture

Connected, not crowded
CCSS Mathematics

The assessed learning intention and progression.

Financial Literacy

Embedded only where the connection is authentic.

SDGs

A meaningful context for every weekly standard set.

AI Literacy

Data, patterns, tools, creation, decisions and ethics.

CUMULATIVE APPLICATION

Three PBL checkpoints

Week 9Week 18Week 27

TEACHER PLANNING

Weekly Curriculum

Search standards, skills, contexts, codes or vocabulary.

STANDARDS FRAMEWORK

Financial Literacy

60 progressive AIS standards, coded for authentic mathematics integration.

GLOBAL CONTEXT

SDG Integration Guide

Targets selected for age-appropriate mathematical application and evidence.

FUTURE-READY PRACTICE

AI Literacy Framework

Students learn to use, question, verify and improve AI-supported mathematical thinking.

PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

PBL Weeks 9, 18 and 27

Cumulative opportunities to apply mathematics, financial decisions, sustainability and AI literacy.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

Leadership Evidence

A concise overview for curriculum review, coaching and inspection readiness.

Evidence to sample

  • Weekly plans show the CCSS learning intention first.
  • FL codes appear only where students make a genuine financial decision.
  • Every week includes an SDG-linked mathematical application.
  • AI evidence includes student verification, revision or responsible-use reflection.
  • PBL samples demonstrate cumulative standards and student justification.

Coaching questions

  • Did the context deepen the mathematics?
  • Can students explain the financial or sustainable decision with evidence?
  • Did students verify an AI-supported idea independently?
  • Is the task accessible to EAL and SOD learners while extending G&T learners?
  • What evidence shows transfer beyond the original example?